Wine Importer Quoted in AFP Article on "Typicity" The article reprinted below, is being sent all over the world by the AFP, which is France's equivalent of the Associated Press. The article addresses the important issue of the French INAO refusing to give the Appéllation Origine Contrôlée to some of France's best vignerons. Incredibly, Réné Rénou, who is the head of the INAO and a producer of Bonnézeaux, is quoted as saying: "If a certain wine is excellent, but the average level of the AOC is not, then it is normal for that wine to be excluded from the AOC...." Frankly, it is reprehensible for Rénou to say such a thing! One can only hope that he was misquoted. The article also includes quotes from other famous figures in the international wine scene like Patrick Baudouin from the Côteaux-du-Layon, Marcel Richaud from Cairanne and Joe Dressner, The Wine Importer. The only place I think the article has been printed is in the Tapei Times of December 27th. The article is reprinted below: ========================================= Furor over French wine system a case of sour grapes? AFP , PARIS Saturday, Dec 27, 2003,Page 12 His eyes as intense as his prize-winning wines, Loire Valley vintner Patrick Baudouin is hopping mad. So are 100 winemakers across France, some with reputations spanning the globe, who have joined him in a movement that is exposing deep rifts and flaws in the French wine classification system, and shaping the debate on how best to reform it. It is a system, they contend, that rewards mediocrity and standardization while at the same time punishing vintners who choose more rigorous, labor-intensive methods yielding wines that are often among the best in their regions, but which are nonetheless rejected by peer tasting panels as "atypical." The financial repercussions for a winemaker of having a vintage declassified can be disastrous. Without the state-backed certification-of-origin known as the AOC, or appellation d'origine controlie, the market value of a wine plummets. Add Pomerol or Chateauneuf-du-Pape to the label, to cite two well known AOCs, and prices soar. The key word in the debate sparked by Baudouin and his like-minded confreres, federated in an association called Winemakers in our Appellations, is "typicity" (a neologism in French, typiciti, as well as in English). In the eyes of France's powerful wine administration and large-scale producers, "typicity" is a virtue and a necessity, the signature taste that distinguishes one AOC from another, and all of them from non-French wines. "We have to reestablish a common denominator, a family resemblance, for all the wines in a given appellation," explains Reni Renou, the government's top official directly responsible for overseeing and enforcing the AOC system. There is no room within the AOC household, Renou told reporters, for overly eccentric offspring, even if they are very talented. "If a certain wine is excellent, but the average level of the AOC is not, then it is normal for that wine to be excluded from the AOC," Renou. And that, for Baudouin and his supporters, is precisely the problem. "Typicity has come to mean `majority rule', and the majority in a given AOC" -- there are more than 460 distinct winemaking regions in France -- "is too often overcropping, machine harvesting, artificial yeasts or enzymes, and chaptalization," says US wine importer Joe Dressner, who works exclusively with the small minority of French wine-makers who eschew industrial methods. Chaptalization is the adding of sugar during fermentation to increase alcohol content. The local tasting juries instituted in the mid-1970s were designed to weed out wines with obvious defects, and did help to remove embarrassing aberrations that damaged the overall reputation of individual AOCs. But today "the AOC system has become a marketing machine for standardizing wine, a machine that crushes things outside this norm," good or bad, says Baudouin. One perverse effect of the system is forcing quality winemakers who use natural, non-interventionist methods to break the rules in order to make the best wines possible. "What I am doing is illegal," says Marcel Richaud, a small-scale vintner in the Cotes du Rhone region of southern France. The same wines selected by top restaurants in Paris and importers abroad were judged "atypical" by his peers this year and refused AOC certification after he had bottled them. Baudouin, noted for a sweet, white Coteaux de Layon, also describes himself as a "fraud." Because he refuses to add sugar to artificially boost alcohol levels, in contrast to the majority of winemakers in his region, some of his wines don't conform to certain technical standards. Baudouin's signature wine was rated 99 out of 100 by influential wine critic Robert Parker, so he can afford to jest. But he and Richaud are clearly angry about the situation. "They are simply making real wines," argues Dressner. "In a better world they would be models for their terroir, instead they are pariahs." Part of the impetus to link typicity with an AOC comes from the challenge of New World wines, which have eaten away at France's once dominant position as the world's top exporter of quality wines. Renou, who is president of the National Appellation Institute's National Committee, says the only way for the French wine industry to fight back is by reinforcing the identity of each AOC and trans-forming them into individual "brands" in the mind of consumers, who are too often confused and intimidated by France's complex classification system. But the de facto standardization of French wines has deeper roots in the post-war shift to intensive, chemical-based agriculture, which had much the same homogenizing impact on wine as it did on fruits, vegetables and meats. Despite their diverging views, both Renou and Baudouin see themselves as true defenders of "terroir," the quintessentially French approach that emphasizes the importance of soil and climate over grape variety and wine making skills. AOCs mandate which grape varieties may be used, but generally ban winemakers from including this information on the label. But whereas Renou sees "typicity" as the guarantor of AOC identity and the silver bullet that will make French wines more competitive in the international marketplace, Baudouin see its current application as a straitjacket impeding originality and, even worse, obscuring "the true typiciti of the terroir," which can vary dramatically from one hillside to the next.
Hey, importer. While the AOC system can be abused by the lazy minority(or sometimes majority) to LOWER quality, its rules can also be slowly changed to RAISE quality, and throw out the bums, and thus create a "Community Brand" all can use. Look at the rise of quality Chianti, or even Sancerre itself. That being said, I understand your point of the individual who wants top quality NOW despite vested AOC interests in mediocrity, but there is a danger here too: The cult of Personality. This has ruined any sense of "place" or agriculture for many people who buy Napa, Sonoma, or Aussie wines. Most have no idea where the grapes are grown for Sparky, or Heidi et al.. In short, I think I understand the spirit Renou seeks to impart: Allow the individual to shine but fearing an exodus of talent from the AOC. Raising quality of the AOC, but "diplomatically " enough so as not to rip apart a Community AOC that gave birth to the very Talent that now outshines it.
Too bad about Richaud. He makes a great Cotes du Rhone...er...wine.
Hey, this is just one example, and not fully explored, but some growers use "leaving the AOC" as a dubious claim of quality. Anselmi so longer calls their wines "Soave", but the equally great, or superior, growers of Pieropan and Gini still use the DOCG.
Speaking of wine...most wine tastes like bitter dilute swill...perhaps the AOC should require anyone making good wine call it something else to eliminate consumer confusion.
The AOC is the protector of place, so long as it does not kill quality changes. We already have too many beverages known only by a brand, which could be made anywhere. "Merlot" "Shiraz" and "Coke" come to mind (from the high rated producers, only.
the a.o.c. is a flawed system, for sure not as flawed as the bcs, but flawed nonetheless. it makes some sense that a wine not qualify for a.o.c. "status" if some of the grapes come from without the appellation area, or if the grapes themselves are not those traditional to the appellation (although there surely should be a way to bring new, different and perhaps better grapes to qualify), but simply because a wine is too good, or too high in alcohol , or made from grapes with a portable umbrella staking system, or some other method that improves quality is so idiotic that it makes one want to try marquis phillips or whatever it's called. does this mean that unchaptalized burgundy can't be a.o.c.?
Let freedom ring, and let the market decide!! |